Bullying: A Statistical Report on Bullying

This statistical report was written to bring awareness to the seriousness of bullying that is taking place in our community. It examines the causes, effects, prevention and intervention along with the penalties for bullies necessary to reduce bullying in our community.  By working collectively as a team we can reduce and enforce bullying prevention and protect our children.

Written by:  By Marsha S. Roopchand

                                                                                   

              

(top picture) 18 year old Bobby Tillman was beaten to death at a house party in Douglasville Georgia November 2010, 11- year old Jaheem Herrera hung himself in his home after repeated bullying on april 16, 2009.


Let’s work together to protect our children by being actively involved in our children’s lives, asking questions, speaking to school staff and paying more attention to our kids behavioral changes.  It’s time to take a stand and stop bullying!.  Alarmingly, 4.1 percent of students ages 12-18 who were bullied—approximately 289,000 students—reported bringing a gun, knife, or other weapon to school; 7.4 percent of students who were cyber bullied reported bringing a weapon to school.

In October 2010, the Department of Education sent a letter to public schools and universities highlighting the importance of reducing bullying. “Bullying fosters a climate of fear and disrespect,” the letter said. It reminded administrators that they are required to respond to bullying that may be motivated by sexual orientation or race. According to the report, schools rely on a combination of security guards and cameras, staff supervision, and inclusion of anti-bullying measures in student codes of conduct to prevent bullying.

Most commonly, students were made fun of or were the subject of rumors. About 5 percent of high school students reported being threatened with harm, and 6.6 percent were pushed, shoved, tripped, or spit on. Most of the bullying occurred in school hallways, stairwells, or in the classroom. Less commonly, students were bullied in the bathroom or locker room, in the school cafeteria, or on the school bus.

Younger students were more likely to be bullied than upperclassmen. About 36 percent of middle school students reported being bullied, compared to 25.8 percent of high school students. Twenty-eight percent of freshmen were bullied at least once during the school year compared to 1 in 5 seniors.  High school students were more likely to hide being bullied. Forty-four percent of middle school students reported notifying an adult of bullying; high schoolers notified an adult just over a quarter of the time.

Although fewer students overall reported being bullied online, more of those students responded to bullying: 15 percent of students who had been cyber bullied got into a physical fight because of the bullying, and 17 percent avoided certain parts of their schools out of fear.  Most commonly, cyber bullying victims said hurtful information about them was spread on the Internet, or they received unwanted contact online or unwanted text messages.

Cyber safety expert Parry Aftab says that although many administrators feel they can’t get involved with virtual bullying that doesn’t occur on school grounds, the Supreme Court’s Tinker v. Des Moines decision in 1969 gives administrators some options. The Supreme Court ruled that students’ First Amendment rights did not apply if their actions—wearing black armbands to protest the Vietnam War, in this case—disrupted the school environment.  “If administrators have a reasonable suspicion that online actions will have an immediate effect on the kids in the school, they have the ability to discipline it,” she says. “If students are threatening each other online, you’re interrupting their ability to have an education.”

Read full article

 

 

Chrysanth WebStory Published by WebStory
Advertisements

About gacoalition4childprotectionreform1

For the past 10 years I have been researching family law, constitutional law dealing with deprivation and DFCS/CPS. While I am not a lawyer, I am a special family rights law Advocate; advocating families who have been disrupted by the department of family and children services.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s